πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 404007 | PR | 39 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.1M β†’ Pro Forma $-661K (+$451K)
$8.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$451K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-661K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+535bps
Margin Improvement
$323K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$451K
Modeled Uplift
$309K
Risk-Adjusted
-$143K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$171K
+202bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$169K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$103K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+11bp
Total EBITDA Impact$451K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$162K$8K$171K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$169K$169K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$26K$77K$103K$323K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT70.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$43K$85K$128K$171K$171K$171K$171K
Cost to Collect$0$42K$84K$126K$169K$169K$169K$169K
A/R Days Reduction$0$34K$68K$103K$103K$103K$103K$103K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$124K$248K$367K$451K$451K$451K$451K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $451K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.1Mβ€”$-1.1M-13.2%
Year 1$-1.1M+$301K$-845K-10.0%
Year 2$-1.2M+$451K$-729K-8.6%
Year 3$-1.2M+$451K$-764K-9.1%
Year 4$-1.3M+$451K$-801K-9.5%
Year 5$-1.3M+$451K$-839K-9.9%
$-11.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-9.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.9M
Value Created
$-839K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.8M
Organic Growth
$4.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-839K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$85K$128K$171K$205K
Cost to Collect$84K$126K$169K$202K
A/R Days Reduction$51K$77K$103K$123K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$226K$339K$451K$542K

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 14 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-13.2%-50.0%-15.1%-0.8%
P50
Net-to-Gross75.9%52.1%58.4%70.5%
P79
Occupancy68.9%46.6%65.0%88.0%
P50
Rev/Bed$216K$190K$372K$446K
P29
Exp/Bed$245K$240K$399K$551K
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML