πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 391314 | PA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $607K β†’ Pro Forma $3.4M (+$2.8M)
$53.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$607K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$2.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$963K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.9M (vs $2.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$654K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$34K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.0M$30K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$165K$489K$654K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$34K$34K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$269K$537K$806K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$266K$532K$798K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$218K$436K$654K$654K$654K$654K$654K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K
Cumulative$0$770K$1.5M$2.3M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x108% / 39.3x113% / 44.0x118% / 48.7x120% / 51.1x122% / 53.4x
9.0x103% / 34.5x108% / 38.8x112% / 43.0x114% / 45.0x116% / 47.1x
10.0x98% / 30.8x103% / 34.5x107% / 38.3x109% / 40.2x111% / 42.1x
11.0x94% / 27.7x99% / 31.1x103% / 34.5x105% / 36.3x107% / 38.0x
12.0x91% / 25.1x95% / 28.2x99% / 31.4x101% / 33.0x103% / 34.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.0x
Headroom (turns)
77%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 77% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.5x, adding 7.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$607Kβ€”$607K1.1%
Year 1$625K+$1.9M$2.5M4.7%
Year 2$644K+$2.8M$3.5M6.5%
Year 3$663K+$2.8M$3.5M6.5%
Year 4$683K+$2.8M$3.5M6.5%
Year 5$704K+$2.8M$3.5M6.6%
$6.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$38.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$32.8M
Value Created
$3.5M
Exit EBITDA
$967K
Organic Growth
$28.3M
RCM Value Creation
$3.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$537K$806K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$532K$798K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$327K$490K$654K$784K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$26K$34K$41K
Total$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 59 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.1%-19.4%-1.5%5.7%
P58
Net-to-Gross50.0%24.6%31.2%41.6%
P85
Occupancy38.6%18.4%35.6%54.5%
P53
Rev/Bed$2.1M$419K$1.1M$2.1M
P76
Exp/Bed$2.1M$547K$1.2M$1.9M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML