πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 360148 | OH | 41 beds | Current EBITDA $3.7M β†’ Pro Forma $5.7M (+$2.0M)
$38.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$805K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$778K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$770K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$473K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$25K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$778K$778K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$748K$21K$770K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$119K$354K$473K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$25K$25K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$194K$389K$583K$778K$778K$778K$778K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$192K$385K$577K$770K$770K$770K$770K
A/R Days Reduction$0$158K$315K$473K$473K$473K$473K$473K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Cumulative$0$557K$1.1M$1.7M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x
9.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x
10.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
11.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
12.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.7Mβ€”$3.7M9.4%
Year 1$3.8M+$1.4M$5.1M13.2%
Year 2$3.9M+$2.0M$5.9M15.2%
Year 3$4.0M+$2.0M$6.0M15.5%
Year 4$4.1M+$2.0M$6.2M15.8%
Year 5$4.2M+$2.0M$6.3M16.1%
$36.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$69.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$32.5M
Value Created
$6.3M
Exit EBITDA
$5.8M
Organic Growth
$20.5M
RCM Value Creation
$6.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$389K$583K$778K$933K
Denial Rate Reductio$385K$577K$770K$924K
A/R Days Reduction$237K$355K$473K$568K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$19K$25K$30K
Total$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.5M

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 111 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.4%-13.0%-1.8%10.4%
P71
Net-to-Gross49.3%26.1%36.5%45.5%
P83
Occupancy23.5%26.9%39.0%61.1%
P16
Rev/Bed$948K$361K$952K$2.0M
P49
Exp/Bed$859K$362K$888K$2.0M
P47

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML