πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 230058 | MI | 42 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.9M β†’ Pro Forma $-4.4M (+$4.6M)
$87.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$4.6M
Modeled Uplift
$3.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.0M (vs $4.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$56K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$48K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$268K$794K$1.1M$3.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$56K$56K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$436K$872K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$432K$864K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$354K$708K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$28K$56K$56K$56K$56K$56K$56K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.9Mβ€”$-8.9M-10.3%
Year 1$-9.2M+$3.1M$-6.2M-7.1%
Year 2$-9.5M+$4.6M$-4.9M-5.6%
Year 3$-9.8M+$4.6M$-5.2M-6.0%
Year 4$-10.1M+$4.6M$-5.5M-6.3%
Year 5$-10.4M+$4.6M$-5.8M-6.6%
$-89.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-63.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$25.8M
Value Created
$-5.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-14.3M
Organic Growth
$45.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-5.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$872K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$864K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$531K$796K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$28K$42K$56K$67K
Total$2.3M$3.4M$4.6M$5.5M

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 75 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.3%-12.4%-3.3%8.3%
P30
Net-to-Gross33.5%31.4%37.3%46.5%
P35
Occupancy39.0%17.4%36.4%55.1%
P53
Rev/Bed$2.1M$646K$1.4M$2.3M
P69
Exp/Bed$2.3M$617K$1.5M$2.3M
P73

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML