πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 194102 | LA | 19 beds | Current EBITDA $1.3M β†’ Pro Forma $1.7M (+$399K)
$7.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$399K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+538bps
Margin Improvement
$284K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$399K
Modeled Uplift
$287K
Risk-Adjusted
-$112K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$151K
+204bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$148K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$90K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+13bp
Total EBITDA Impact$399K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$143K$8K$151K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$148K$148K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$23K$67K$90K$284K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$38K$76K$113K$151K$151K$151K$151K
Cost to Collect$0$37K$74K$111K$148K$148K$148K$148K
A/R Days Reduction$0$30K$60K$90K$90K$90K$90K$90K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$110K$219K$324K$399K$399K$399K$399K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $399K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
9.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x
11.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
12.0x32% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.3Mβ€”$1.3M17.1%
Year 1$1.3M+$266K$1.6M21.2%
Year 2$1.3M+$399K$1.7M23.5%
Year 3$1.4M+$399K$1.8M24.1%
Year 4$1.4M+$399K$1.8M24.7%
Year 5$1.5M+$399K$1.9M25.2%
$12.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$20.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.9M
Value Created
$1.9M
Exit EBITDA
$2.0M
Organic Growth
$4.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$76K$113K$151K$181K
Cost to Collect$74K$111K$148K$178K
A/R Days Reduction$45K$68K$90K$108K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$200K$299K$399K$479K

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 114 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.1%-14.8%-1.8%8.0%
P88
Net-to-Gross52.4%33.9%47.3%61.4%
P62
Occupancy80.5%20.5%46.4%68.5%
P88
Rev/Bed$390K$290K$548K$1.0M
P38
Exp/Bed$323K$279K$588K$1.0M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML