πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 192029 | LA | 18 beds | Current EBITDA $3.0M β†’ Pro Forma $3.7M (+$634K)
$12.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$634K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$460K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$634K
Modeled Uplift
$483K
Risk-Adjusted
-$151K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$240K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$239K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$146K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$634K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$240K$240K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$231K$8K$239K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$37K$109K$146K$460K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$60K$120K$180K$240K$240K$240K$240K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$60K$119K$179K$239K$239K$239K$239K
A/R Days Reduction$0$49K$97K$146K$146K$146K$146K$146K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$173K$346K$514K$634K$634K$634K$634K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $634K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.5x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.0Mβ€”$3.0M25.2%
Year 1$3.1M+$423K$3.5M29.5%
Year 2$3.2M+$634K$3.8M32.1%
Year 3$3.3M+$634K$3.9M32.9%
Year 4$3.4M+$634K$4.0M33.7%
Year 5$3.5M+$634K$4.1M34.5%
$30.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$45.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$15.3M
Value Created
$4.1M
Exit EBITDA
$4.8M
Organic Growth
$6.3M
RCM Value Creation
$4.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$120K$180K$240K$288K
Denial Rate Reductio$119K$179K$239K$287K
A/R Days Reduction$73K$109K$146K$175K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$317K$476K$634K$761K

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 107 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.2%-14.1%-1.8%7.7%
P94
Net-to-Gross48.6%35.2%48.0%61.4%
P51
Occupancy90.2%21.1%48.9%69.5%
P98
Rev/Bed$666K$290K$544K$1.0M
P57
Exp/Bed$498K$280K$536K$1.1M
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML