πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 100224 | FL | 194 beds | Current EBITDA $49.4M β†’ Pro Forma $58.4M (+$9.0M)
$171.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$49.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$58.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$9.0M
Modeled Uplift
$6.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.0M
Execution Discount
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.0M (vs $9.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$110K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.4M$3.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.3M$94K$3.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$527K$1.6M$2.1M$6.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$110K$110K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT22.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$858K$1.7M$2.6M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$850K$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$696K$1.4M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$55K$110K$110K$110K$110K$110K$110K
Cumulative$0$2.5M$4.9M$7.3M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
9.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x40% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$49.4Mβ€”$49.4M28.8%
Year 1$50.9M+$6.0M$56.9M33.2%
Year 2$52.4M+$9.0M$61.5M35.8%
Year 3$54.0M+$9.0M$63.0M36.7%
Year 4$55.6M+$9.0M$64.6M37.7%
Year 5$57.3M+$9.0M$66.3M38.6%
$494.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$729.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$235.3M
Value Created
$66.3M
Exit EBITDA
$78.7M
Organic Growth
$90.3M
RCM Value Creation
$66.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.7M$2.6M$3.4M$4.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$4.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
Clean Claim Rate$55K$82K$110K$132K
Total$4.5M$6.8M$9.0M$10.8M

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 127 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin28.8%-6.5%3.7%16.4%
P89
Net-to-Gross9.1%10.1%15.4%22.0%
P11
Occupancy54.0%52.3%64.1%75.4%
P30
Rev/Bed$885K$701K$1.1M$1.3M
P38
Exp/Bed$630K$671K$920K$1.2M
P21

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML