πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 050581 | CA | 168 beds | Current EBITDA $25.5M β†’ Pro Forma $38.6M (+$13.1M)
$249.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$25.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$38.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$13.1M
Modeled Uplift
$9.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.7M (vs $13.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$160K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.0M$5.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.8M$137K$4.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$765K$2.3M$3.0M$9.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$160K$160K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$80K$160K$160K$160K$160K$160K$160K
Cumulative$0$3.6M$7.1M$10.6M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x
9.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
10.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$25.5Mβ€”$25.5M10.2%
Year 1$26.3M+$8.7M$35.0M14.0%
Year 2$27.1M+$13.1M$40.2M16.1%
Year 3$27.9M+$13.1M$41.0M16.4%
Year 4$28.7M+$13.1M$41.8M16.8%
Year 5$29.6M+$13.1M$42.7M17.1%
$255.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$469.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$214.5M
Value Created
$42.7M
Exit EBITDA
$40.6M
Organic Growth
$131.2M
RCM Value Creation
$42.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.5M$3.7M$5.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.5M$3.7M$4.9M$5.9M
A/R Days Reduction$1.5M$2.3M$3.0M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$80K$120K$160K$192K
Total$6.6M$9.8M$13.1M$15.7M

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 210 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.2%-17.3%-4.5%3.7%
P86
Net-to-Gross10.3%18.0%22.3%29.2%
P6
Occupancy82.2%46.6%60.0%72.5%
P87
Rev/Bed$1.5M$770K$1.4M$2.2M
P55
Exp/Bed$1.3M$810K$1.6M$2.4M
P40

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML