πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 050230 | CA | 167 beds | Current EBITDA $2.2M β†’ Pro Forma $6.4M (+$4.2M)
$78.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$4.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.5M (vs $4.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$960K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$51K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$43K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$242K$718K$960K$3.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$51K$51K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$395K$789K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$391K$781K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$320K$640K$960K$960K$960K$960K$960K
Clean Claim Rate$0$25K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.3M$3.4M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x80% / 18.9x85% / 21.4x89% / 23.9x91% / 25.1x92% / 26.4x
9.0x75% / 16.5x80% / 18.7x84% / 20.9x86% / 22.0x87% / 23.1x
10.0x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.5x79% / 18.5x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.4x
11.0x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.3x
12.0x63% / 11.6x68% / 13.2x72% / 14.8x73% / 15.7x75% / 16.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.6x
Headroom (turns)
55%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 55% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.9x, adding 5.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.2Mβ€”$2.2M2.8%
Year 1$2.3M+$2.8M$5.0M6.4%
Year 2$2.3M+$4.2M$6.5M8.2%
Year 3$2.4M+$4.2M$6.6M8.3%
Year 4$2.5M+$4.2M$6.6M8.4%
Year 5$2.6M+$4.2M$6.7M8.5%
$22.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$73.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$51.8M
Value Created
$6.7M
Exit EBITDA
$3.5M
Organic Growth
$41.5M
RCM Value Creation
$6.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$789K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$781K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$480K$720K$960K$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$25K$38K$51K$61K
Total$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$5.0M

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 210 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.8%-17.3%-4.5%3.7%
P72
Net-to-Gross25.8%18.0%22.3%29.2%
P63
Occupancy26.6%46.6%60.0%72.5%
P5
Rev/Bed$473K$770K$1.4M$2.2M
P12
Exp/Bed$459K$810K$1.6M$2.4M
P11

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML